tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2937941468982436679.post7355128387279177652..comments2013-02-06T10:51:10.579-08:00Comments on Just Add Noise: Just an Idea to Throw Out ThereBayesian Empirimancerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18110557307446065462noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2937941468982436679.post-4221192799922893842010-11-09T03:52:56.909-08:002010-11-09T03:52:56.909-08:00Physicists are an extreme example. But i think th...Physicists are an extreme example. But i think that scientists do, in fact, fall into that category.<br /><br />The only info i've seen on the CIBP is Hanna's slides and a conversation with Ian Murray who is has a paper showing that DBM's are universal function approximators.Bayesian Empirimancerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18110557307446065462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2937941468982436679.post-28450621857751545992010-11-09T02:24:32.580-08:002010-11-09T02:24:32.580-08:00Nice one, J. Are there actually people who serious...Nice one, J. Are there actually people who seriously claim that they understand how the data is generated, for data that they didn't generate themselves?<br /><br />J.<br /><br />PS: Not sure about the 'basically no assumptions' bit. Does the DBN & CIBP really cover the large subspace in the whole space of possible models?<br /><br />PS: Do you have more info on the CIBP at hand? I'm too lazy to search.Jannoreply@blogger.com